VideoErb Institute

CPRT Mini-Workshop: Managing Political Spending Risk in the 2024 US Election

Video 1 of 1

 

With the tumultuous events of the 2024 US election season, companies are reviewing a wider range of risk scenarios — from political violence to election interference, conflicting stakeholder pressures, regulatory uncertainty, and the politicization of strategic business issues. These challenges are unlikely to abate completely after the election.

In this hyper-politicized environment, proactive risk management is all the more important. One major area of risk management is whether companies’ political spending aligns with their public statements and commitments, exposes the firm to political pressure, or has broader impacts on the systems and institutions that are foundational to the business. Managing these risks is not a trivial exercise; it involves complex decisions, tradeoffs, and judgment calls.

To help companies take a consistent, principled approach, the CPR Taskforce has been hosting a series of mini-workshops on Corporate Political Responsibility and Election Readiness 2024. First, we explored How to Conduct a Political Risk Assessment, and then High-stakes Decisions in a Polarized World, Using our New CPR Decision Tool.

The session was led by Elizabeth Doty, Director of the Erb Institute’s Corporate Political Responsibility Taskforce, and will feature three distinguished guests: 

The CPRT is strictly non-partisan and does not advocate, promote, or support any political party or candidate. While members and partners may express their views freely, we do not endorse or advocate particular policies or legislation but may provide thought processes for evaluating proposals based on CPR principles.   

More Resources

Sort by type
241 – 260 of 324 results showing
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ReportWorld Benchmarking Alliance

Deep analysis of how to incorporate CPR into financial institutions, with a benchmarking proposal to drive successful market signaling initiatives. (See pg 3-20)

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleHarvard Business Review

This article urges companies to actively reduce the polarization that can impact their businesses, by carefully considering their public stances, promoting inclusivity, and fostering collaboration across differing viewpoints within their organizations and communities.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleForbes

This article argues that Modern Portfolio Theory falls short in today’s interconnected and complex risk landscape, calling for “system-level investing” that integrates social, environmental, and economic factors to boost long-term resilience and sustainability.

View Details
BookHarvard Business Review Press

Introduces the concept of “net positive advocacy,” which involves working with partners to advocate for policy that supports systemic solutions and net positive outcomes for all competitors. This requires courage and a shift in mindset, but actually helps de-risk both sustainable business strategies AND political interactions for companies. Their Readiness Test tool provides a useful conversation starter about the change in mindset required.  

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ReportWorld Resources Institute

As companies face increased pressure to advocate publicly for robust climate policies, this WRI report outlines three internal and four external barriers, including org charts and quarterly reports as well as trade associations and political winds, that present the biggest hurdles to implementation, and suggests ways to overcome them.

View Details
WebsiteWorld Benchmarking Alliance

This framework is developed through a multi-stakeholder process and designed to gauge company progress against the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It provides succinct definitions for various core social indicators (CSIs), as well as a rubric to gauge company performance regarding these indicators. CSI 18 is their standard for responsible lobbying and political engagement, drawing from the Transparency International principles.

View Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

Stay in the loop.