ToolCivic Business Initiative, Harvard Negotiation Project

Preparing for Civil Unrest Risk Around the 2026 Midterm Elections

What It Is: A board briefing deck from the non-partisan Civic Business Initiative making the case that business has an interest in tracking and preparing for election-related risks. It lays out four scenarios for the 2026 midterms, from a normal, noisy election to a drawn-out national dispute, and five practical steps companies can take before a crisis.

Why It Matters: Data shows that election-related civil unrest is not likely, but the risk is higher than in past elections. Only 49% of Americans expect a free and fair midterm, threats rose from 2% to 14% of election-office incident reports between 2020 and 2024, and confidence in the courts fell from 59% to 35%. Most election risks, like cyberattacks, are already planned for. Civil unrest usually isn’t, a gap that bears directly on Responsibility b), upholding strong constitutional democracy.

How to Use It: Though time is short, being prepared is still useful – as a crisis could occur after election day. Use the deck to brief your board and start with three moves: designate an owner for internal planning and external coordination; amplify official election information and encourage nonpartisan voting and poll-worker service; and connect with peer companies and a trusted convener, such as a local chamber, now rather than during an event.

More Resources

Sort by type
261 – 280 of 434 results showing
WebsiteCivic Alliance

Civic Alliance assembled a robust playbook for companies to more representatively support a strong democracy. The playbook includes concepts to support one’s business case, questions to ask oneself in building an action plan, and concrete steps to better engage employees, consumers, and other stakeholders.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleHarvard Business Review

Strine and Lund argue that political spending hurts shareholder interests because it increases risks, is not transparent, and correlates with lower financial performance. They make the case that companies should either end all spending, obtain shareholder consent, or limit expenditures to PACs (which are strictly voluntary and have mandated disclosure).

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ReportBeneficial State Foundation

The Equitable Bank Standards define a comprehensive framework for banks across five areas: governance, lending and investments, products and services, operational practices, and corporate citizenship. They lay out concrete standards for maximizing positive social and environmental impact while minimizing harm, guiding bankers, regulators, advocates, and customers in assessing whether finance advances equity and community well-being.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ReportEuropean Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG)

ESRS G1 sets mandatory disclosure requirements on business conduct, covering corporate culture, supplier relationships, anti-corruption and bribery, whistleblower protection, political influence and lobbying, and payment practices, especially toward SMEs. It links governance and conduct to impact, risk, and opportunity management, making companies explain how business behavior supports transparent, sustainable practices for all stakeholders. 

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleChatham House

Using the exodus of companies from Russia due to the war against Ukraine, Bennett argues that, with influential economic power worldwide, multinational companies should consider a new geopolitical corporate responsibility to help support international rules-based order when it is under stress or faces challenges. He explains that this order defines the international community in which nations should respect individual sovereignty and obey the law. 

View Details
ReportFCLTGlobal and EY

This brief provides a practical conversation guide for boards and executives to understand, assess, and act on geopolitical risk. Using a “scan–focus–act” framework, it offers structured questions on stakeholder impacts, long-term strategy, enterprise risk management, and governance changes. It reframes geopolitics as a manageable, board-level responsibility central to resilience and long-term value creation.

View Details

The article maps out a non-partisan, principled conception of good corporate citizenship drawing on shared assumptions of the right and the left about the place of corporations in our society and the realities of corporate governance. That conception concentrates on how corporations’ own conduct affects the best interests of their stockholders, workers, communities of operation, consumers, taxpayers, and the environment. 

View Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Stay in the loop.