VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce

Can Americans Really Collaborate?

Video 1 of 3

 

On May 19, 2022, we spoke with Bill Shireman of Future500 and In This Together and Madeleine Para of Citizens Climate Lobby to explore “Radical Collaboration: Can Business Help Unleash America’s Middle 70% to Address Climate & Strengthen Democracy?”

Though it is rarely featured in the news, research shows that most Americans can collaborate on solutions to systemic threats such as climate change. Yet, many of these “solution citizens” feel isolated and discouraged in the current environment of toxic polarization and destructive conflict. To address this challenge, am community of social entrepreneurs has been emerging, working to enable conservatives and progressives to work together on clean energy, conservation and strengthening democracy.

In this module, we explore:

• How are Americans not as divided as they may seem on solving issues like climate change?

• What is preventing citizens with solutions from leading the way?

The Corporate Political Responsibility Taskforce (CPRT)’s Expert Dialogues are in-depth, recorded conversations with academic experts, stakeholder advocates and business practitioners to provide our members and other CPR champions with the expertise and context they need to develop principled, proactive CPR strategies. We invite those interested in a constructive, non-partisan, principles-based discussion.

Bill Shireman is the President of Future 500 and co-chair of In This Together, which is mobilizing solution citizens and companies to tackle political polarization and revitalize democracy. He is known for bringing together capitalists, activists, conservatives, progressives, and other unusual bedfellows to overcome challenges that often divide them.

Madeleine Para is the Executive Director of Citizens Climate Lobby,a nonprofit, nonpartisan, grassroots advocacy climate change organization bringing a respectful, nonpartisan approach designed to create a broad, sustainable foundation for climate action across all geographic regions and political inclinations.

The full transcript for this module is available here

KEYWORDS: #CorporatePoliticalResponsibility #ESG  #Polarization #Inclusion #CPR_Trends #Climate #CivicInstitutions #CPRProcesses #CPR_Responsibility #Greenwashing

More Resources

Sort by type
161 – 180 of 302 results showing
ArticleHarvard Business Review

Strine and Lund argue that political spending hurts shareholder interests because it increases risks, is not transparent, and correlates with lower financial performance. They make the case that companies should either end all spending, obtain shareholder consent, or limit expenditures to PACs (which are strictly voluntary and have mandated disclosure).

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleChatham House

Using the exodus of companies from Russia due to the war against Ukraine, Bennett argues that, with influential economic power worldwide, multinational companies should consider a new geopolitical corporate responsibility to help support international rules-based order when it is under stress or faces challenges. He explains that this order defines the international community in which nations should respect individual sovereignty and obey the law. 

View Details

The article maps out a non-partisan, principled conception of good corporate citizenship drawing on shared assumptions of the right and the left about the place of corporations in our society and the realities of corporate governance. That conception concentrates on how corporations’ own conduct affects the best interests of their stockholders, workers, communities of operation, consumers, taxpayers, and the environment. 

View Details
WebsiteThe Hoover Institute

This initiative explores how clear, stable legal systems support freedom, innovation, and economic growth—laying the groundwork for healthy markets and democratic institutions.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleHarvard Business Review

This article explores how political identity is increasingly shaping workplace dynamics and offers a leadership strategy grounded in setting clear norms, proactively addressing tensions, and fostering inclusive dialogue—an approach aligned with Third Side principles of navigating conflict through shared understanding and long-term organizational strength.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

Stay in the loop.