Report Frameworks Institute

Filling in the Blanks: Contesting What “the System is Rigged” Means

This report examines the narrative “the system is rigged” and how it undermines trust in institutions, markets and businesses. It offers analysis of framing effects, public attitudes and communication strategies to help leaders rethink how they respond when stakeholders perceive business and government systems as unfair.

 

Related Topics to Check Out:
Business or Supply Chain Disruption (A) – When stakeholders perceive the system as unfair, companies may face disruptions in markets, supply chains, workforce, or material access. 

Reputational Risks (A) – Corporations may be seen as part of a broken system, risking legitimacy and brand value if they fail to address underlying narratives. 

Corporate Communications (B) – The report offers framing techniques and communication strategies to adjust corporate messaging around fairness and systems credibility. 

Stakeholder Engagement (B) – It underscores the importance of listening to community and employee perceptions and engaging meaningfully when system trust is eroded. 

More Resources

Sort by type
341 – 345 of 345 results showing
ReportAccountAbility, UN Global Compact

This guide provides a framework for companies and NGO's to use to determine whether their lobbying practices are responsible.

View Details
BookBerrett Koehler

The book opens by establishing the minimum expectation that businesses support the right rules of the game—those rewarding long-term value creation rather than destruction—and shows how companies can live their values through cross-sector collaboration, eco-efficiency, and strategies advancing prosperity, planet, and people, supported by real-world cases.

View Details
BookHarvard University Press

Mancur Olson’s classic work explains why individuals often fail to organize effectively around shared interests, even when collective action would benefit all. His “free rider” problem and distinction between small and large groups reshape understanding of labor unions, corporations, and political coalitions. Olson’s framework underlies modern theories of governance, lobbying, and institutional design—key foundations for Corporate Political Responsibility. 

View Details
ArticleMIT Sloan

Presents a framework for when companies should present forceful or tempered political positions based on their publicly stated values and materiality.

View Details
Website

The Long-Term Stock Exchange (LTSE) listing standards include expectations that companies will take responsibility for long-term decision-making across strategy, governance, executive compensation, stakeholder engagement, and investor relations. These standards are designed to help businesses build sustainable value over time for all stakeholders, rather than focusing on short-term gains, allowing investors to better assess long-term capital investments.

 

View Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

Stay in the loop.