VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce

Net Positive Advocacy & De-risking Sustainable Business

Video 2 of 3

 

On March 14, 2022, we spoke with Andrew Winston, co-author of Net Positive, to explore “Net Positive Advocacy: Co-creating Policies that Enable Better Outcomes for All”.

Amidst increasingly apparent systemic threats–from climate change to inequality to social instability--business leaders are being confronted with head-spinning dual realities: On the one hand, they engaged in intensive, sometimes overwhelming efforts to improve their firm’s sustainability and responsiveness to stakeholders. And, on the other, they are consistently challenged that their efforts do not add up to the scale or speed that is needed. How can this be... and what can be done?

With their recent book, “Net Positive: How Courageous Companies Thrive by Giving More than They Take”, Andrew Winston and Paul Polman suggest that when leaders take a broader view of their impacts, they will recognize the need for Net Positive Advocacy to co-design systems that enable firms, stakeholders and society to win–de-risking both sustainability and political influence.

In this module, we explore:

  • How are you thinking about “Net Positive Advocacy?” How is it different from traditional approaches to corporate political influence?

The Corporate Political Responsibility Taskforce (CPRT)’s Expert Dialogues are in-depth, recorded conversations with academic experts, stakeholder advocates and business practitioners to provide our members and other CPR champions with the expertise and context they need to develop principled, proactive CPR strategies. We invite those interested in a constructive, non-partisan, principles-based discussion.

KEYWORDS: "#CorporatePoliticalResponsibility #ESG #CPR_Responsibility #Injustice #Inequality #NetPositive

More Resources

Sort by type
361 – 364 of 364 results showing
BookHarvard University Press

Mancur Olson’s classic work explains why individuals often fail to organize effectively around shared interests, even when collective action would benefit all. His “free rider” problem and distinction between small and large groups reshape understanding of labor unions, corporations, and political coalitions. Olson’s framework underlies modern theories of governance, lobbying, and institutional design—key foundations for Corporate Political Responsibility. 

View Details
ArticleMIT Sloan

Presents a framework for when companies should present forceful or tempered political positions based on their publicly stated values and materiality.

View Details
Website

The Long-Term Stock Exchange (LTSE) listing standards include expectations that companies will take responsibility for long-term decision-making across strategy, governance, executive compensation, stakeholder engagement, and investor relations. These standards are designed to help businesses build sustainable value over time for all stakeholders, rather than focusing on short-term gains, allowing investors to better assess long-term capital investments.

 

View Details
ReportSaylor Academy

This textbook section introduces major corporate and agency public-relations subfunctions: issues management, media and community relations, CSR and philanthropy, investor relations, marketing communications, government relations, lobbying, internal communication, crisis management, and more. It shows how communication, advocacy, and stakeholder engagement are structured inside organizations, shaping how they respond to risks, opportunities, and public scrutiny.

View Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

Stay in the loop.