ReportCommittee for Economic Development (The Conference Board)

A Stable Democracy at 250: Trusted Elections as the Foundation Report

What It Is: A 2026 solutions brief in the Sustaining Capitalism series summarizing why free and fair elections matter for democracy and a stable economy. Includes a comprehensive Report, Infographic and Elections Toolkit with background, recommendations and best practices for business leaders and election administration.

Why It Matters: Outlines how a secure, credible, and accessible electoral system builds the business confidence companies need to operate with trust in governance and engage in shaping policy. Also provides background on the declining public confidence ahead of the 2026 midterms and the need to ensure strong administration, understanding of federal, state and local roles and information integrity.

How to Use It: Consider reviewing the Report and using the accompanying Elections Toolkit to take three actions: 1) Proactively encourage employee and community voting in a nonpartisan way; 2) Support election administration by recruiting poll workers and offering flexible scheduling; and 3) Share trusted, official information to counter any election-related mis- and disinformation.

More Resources

Sort by type
281 – 300 of 434 results showing
WebsiteThe Hoover Institute

This initiative explores how clear, stable legal systems support freedom, innovation, and economic growth—laying the groundwork for healthy markets and democratic institutions.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleHarvard Business Review

This article explores how political identity is increasingly shaping workplace dynamics and offers a leadership strategy grounded in setting clear norms, proactively addressing tensions, and fostering inclusive dialogue—an approach aligned with Third Side principles of navigating conflict through shared understanding and long-term organizational strength.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ArticleDirectors & Boards

Provides a framework for boards to manage the reputational, legal, and financial risks of political spending, including misalignment with public commitments, shareholder backlash, and regulatory scrutiny. Emphasizes the need for transparency and alignment with a company’s stated objectives and strategic goals. 

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ToolOECD

This report reviews how 17 jurisdictions regulate corporate political engagement, highlighting gaps in transparency, oversight, and accountability. It calls for stronger governance and investor involvement to prevent undue influence.

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ReportWharton ESG Initiative & EY

This report analyzes how political risk—ranging from regulatory shifts and policy unpredictability to geopolitical tensions—affects corporate valuations, operating costs, supply chains, and long-term investment. It introduces a framework connecting political events to financial consequences, urging companies to integrate political-risk analytics into strategic planning, governance, and ESG-related disclosures to strengthen resilience. 

View Details
Wharton ESG Initiative & EY

This report analyzes how political risk—ranging from regulatory shifts and policy unpredictability to geopolitical tensions—affects corporate valuations, operating costs, supply chains, and long-term investment. It introduces a framework connecting political events to financial consequences, urging companies to integrate political-risk analytics into strategic planning, governance, and ESG-related disclosures to strengthen resilience. 

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
ReportPrinciples for Responsible Investment

In partnership with Chronos Sustainability, this article reflects a survey about (i) how investors identify and assess political engagement activities; (ii) how investors integrate political engagement into their stewardship activities; and (iii) challenges to engaging on responsible political engagement with investees.

View Details
ArticleHarvard Business Review

Based on the fact that the assumption that business and politics can and even should be kept separate is no longer realistic, the authors outline steps that effective leaders should take to ensure strategic decisions in the space, which include: (1) develop robust principles to guide strategic choices; (2) address ethical issues early; (3) consistently communicate and implement their choices; (4) engage with and beyond the industry to shape the context; and (5) learn from mistakes to make better choices in the future.

View Details
ReportInternational Science Council, UNDRR, and Risk KAN

This briefing note defines systemic risk as cascading, cross-sectoral impacts that threaten the stability of interconnected global systems. Drawing on climate, disaster, and environmental science, it argues for integrating systems thinking into policy, data, and governance. It calls for anticipatory, inclusive, and transdisciplinary risk management that bridges research and decision-making, emphasizing relational information, adaptive learning, and resilience dividends. 

View Details
VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce
Video Details
WebsiteThe Capitals Coalition

The Capitals Coalition is a global network that helps businesses recognize how their success is directly or indirectly supported by natural, social, and human capital—like clean air, skilled workers, and public trust. It offers practical frameworks, case studies, and tools to help companies measure, value, and better manage these dependencies for more sustainable, informed decisions.

View Details
ArticleReason Magazine

This article distinguishes between pro-market policies that enhance competition – so businesses that create value are rewarded -- and pro-business policies that favor specific businesses or industries. It argues that government favoritism distorts competition, undermines innovation, reduces opportunity and weakens democratic accountability, urging policymakers to prioritize competitive neutrality and institutional integrity over industry capture. 

Why this resource matters 
It reflects CPR’s Responsibility principle, calling for businesses to “champion   healthy market “rules of the game” that foster competition on the basis of quality, price and long-term value, minimizing costs externalized to other stakeholders and aligning private interests with the broader public good.” 

View Details

This volume explores the promise of free markets to deliver prosperity and well-being—and the social, political, and institutional conditions required to sustain that promise. It shows why businesses have a stake in helping maintain those conditions through responsible political engagement.

View Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Stay in the loop.