A far-reaching account of how intractable conflicts can be transformed, and the mindset that enables breakthroughs. Outlines specific approaches from conflict resolutin and peace-building, including how to leverage a "third side."
Convergence Compass is an online learning program for business, government, higher education and civic actors that teaches the psychology of division, dialogue strategies, and collaborative problem-solving. Developed from the Convergence Center for Policy Resolution's innovative methods, it equips participants to build trust, bridge divides, engage constructively on contentious issues, design effective processes —even when stakeholders hold strongly divergent views.
OpenSecrets is a nonpartisan, nonprofit transparency platform that tracks money in U.S. politics, compiling and analyzing campaign finance, lobbying, outside spending, and personal finance data for politicians. It offers searchable tools and educational resources that reveal how money flows around elections and policymaking, supporting evidence-based oversight by media, investors, employees, and the public.
This interactive database tracks corporate and individual contributions to 527 political organizations, offering transparency into issue-advocacy groups, political committees, and their funders. It enables stakeholders to analyze donation patterns, compare companies, and evaluate alignment between stated values, lobbying positions, and political spending, supporting stronger governance and oversight of political influence.
This report outlines policy frameworks for strengthening Europe’s preparedness and governance capacity in response to rapid advances in artificial intelligence. It examines regulatory coordination, democratic oversight, geopolitical competitiveness, and institutional resilience, arguing that AI governance must balance innovation, public trust, and long-term societal stability across economic and political systems.
What It Is: A media bias-rating and balanced-news platform that displays the same story as covered from left, center, and right sources side by side, curated by an explicitly multipartisan editorial team using published bias-rating methodology.
Why It Matters: By exposing bias and showing how outlets frame the same story differently, AllSides gives readers an evidence-based way to evaluate information rather than relying on one source's framing .
How to Use It: Use the Bias Checker or Media Bias Chart to vet sources before sharing internally or point employees or students to the Headline Roundups as a media-literacy habit.
This explainer outlines the historical and constitutional significance of the 13th and 14th Amendments, emphasizing their role in establishing equal protection, citizenship, and inclusive governance principles. It connects constitutional protections to contemporary debates around equity, participation, and democratic legitimacy in American civic and institutional life.
This commentary argues that rising authoritarianism represents a material risk to investors by undermining rule of law, regulatory stability, and democratic institutions. It explores how political systems influence capital markets and suggests investors and companies must incorporate governance and democracy risks into investment analysis.
Businesses United in Leading Democracy is a coalition initiative encouraging companies to support democratic participation, civic trust, and institutional resilience through nonpartisan engagement. The initiative promotes collaboration among businesses committed to protecting democratic norms, strengthening civic systems, and encouraging responsible corporate leadership in periods of political polarization and democratic strain.
What It Is: Anthropic's published governance document defining its AI model's intended values, priorities, and behavioral constraints — including a stated hierarchy (safety, ethics, guideline compliance, helpfulness) and explicit "hard constraints" the model must never cross, released publicly under a Creative Commons license.
Why It Matters: The document operationalizes Accountability and Transparency by publishing the company's internal decision-making priorities and self-imposed limits in detail, including an explicit commitment to avoiding "problematic concentrations of power" and preserving checks and balances — one of the clearest corporate self-governance parallels to CPR's core concerns, applied to a company's product rather than its political conduct.
How to Use It: Use as a case study in corporate self-governance and voluntary constitutional commitments — a company publicly codifying its own guardrails ahead of regulation — useful for comparing against other governance frameworks like B Corp certification or a corporate lobbying policy.
This article argues that US political risk is no longer an abstract concern for boards and investors – it is an immediate governance challenge. Specifically, it explores how escalating polarization, regulatory volatility, and election-related instability require enhanced governance safeguards to protect enterprise value – and proposes two tools that can help.
Why this resource matters
It outlines the rationale for embedding CPR in the governance of public affairs and recommends Third Side Strategies’ Principled Influence: A Guide to Strengthening Public Affairs Practices in Polarized Environments. (NOTE: This article is authored by Stephen M. Davis, a member of The CPR Hub’s Board of Advisors.)
This guidance document from B Labs outlines how companies can develop responsible lobbying policies that align with new B Corp Standards, based on their stated business purpose. It provides practical recommendations on policy alignment, oversight, disclosure, and accountability mechanisms to ensure political influence activities align with the responsible lobbying policy.
This analysis examines how Hungary’s political system under Viktor Orbán weakened democratic institutions, judicial independence, and competitive markets through centralized political and economic control. It explores the relationship between authoritarian governance, market distortion, and declining institutional accountability, highlighting implications for investors, businesses, and democratic stability.
What It Is: A 2026 book by Eric Ries, founder of the Lean Startup movement and the Long-Term Stock Exchange, arguing that companies drift from their mission not through bad actors but through poorly designed governance systems — ownership structures, incentives, and decision-making rules that that lack the structural integrity to defend against internal and external pressures.
Why It Matters: Ries reframes governance as a design problem rather than a compliance exercise, arguing that Accountability to the mission has to be built into a company's structure — charters, voting rights, incentive design — rather than added on after mission drift has already happened.
How to Use It: Use it to prompt discussions with boards and founders about potential mission drift, and timely redesign of governance structures.
What It Is: A July 2026 report based on 12 in-depth interviews with Republican and Democratic political operatives (analyzed via qualitative coding), examining how party insiders actually view their role in primaries and which electoral reforms they believe would or wouldn't strengthen political parties.
Why It Matters: The findings are concrete and counterintuitive: every operative interviewed said party organizations exist to win elections, not to shape ideology, and most were skeptical that reforms like ranked-choice voting or nonpartisan primaries would meaningfully improve trust — favoring instead reforms that strengthen parties' own fundraising and organizing capacity. That's directly useful for Legitimacy-focused conversations about electoral reform, grounding them in how the system actually operates rather than how reformers assume it operates.
How to Use It: Use as a primer before your government-affairs or corporate PAC team engages with any electoral-reform-adjacent policy conversation in the states where you operate, to understand how party insiders themselves are likely to respond to proposed changes.
This study analyzes how corporate political advocacy influences online consumer behavior and user-generated content. It examines how political positioning by brands shapes engagement, sentiment, and digital discourse, highlighting the reputational and relational consequences of corporate participation in contentious public issues.
This report by BSR explores how a strategic context defined by fragmentation, geopolitical tension, contested information, and uneven economic and social conditions impacts companies' sustainability strategies. As climate impacts, inequality, and technological disruption accelerate, the report argues that sustainability strategies should be sharper, more resilient, and more closely tied to enterprise priorities.
The authors also argue that business plays a critical role in safeguarding the stable operating environment and bedrock institutions necessary for its success.
What It Is: A research initiative from UC San Diego's Yankelovich Center, run with MIT's Election Data Science Lab and Johns Hopkins' SNF Agora Institute, testing which communication strategies actually build voter trust in elections and publishing both peer-reviewed studies and short practitioner briefs.
Why It Matters: The research yields concrete, usable findings — 'pre-bunking' messages measurably reduce distrust of delayed results, and state-produced informational videos increase trust in that state's own election process — giving Transparency-focused communication a tested foundation rather than guesswork, directly relevant to the Legitimacy of election administration. 'Pre-bunking' refers to giving people accurate information about something before they encounter a misleading claim about it, so they're less likely to be swayed when they do.
How to Use It: Pull specific briefs (on pre-bunking messages or informational videos) to inform how your organization communicates with employees about election timelines and results.
This handbook provides practical guidance for fostering belonging, inclusion, and social cohesion across communities and institutions. It explores how organizations can strengthen trust, civic participation, and cross-cultural understanding while addressing polarization, exclusion, and identity-based division in increasingly diverse societies.
This report is based on interviews with twenty-nine partners and associates from law firms that responded to 2025-26 Executive Orders and other federal challenges with a wide variety of strategies -- from compliance to lawsuits.
The focus was on the strategic calculations driving decisions by individual lawyers and law firms, regardless of the strategy they took. The report concludes that fear significantly magnifies perceptions of risk, collective action is critical in responding to pressure, and business leaders have a crucial stake in upholding rule of law, for its own sake and as a cornerstone of the free market system.