VideoCorporate Political Responsibility Taskforce

Non-Spending as a Viable Government Relations Strategy

Video 1 of 3

 

On September 30, 2021, we spoke with Chris Padilla, Vice President, Government & Regulatory Affairs at IBM to explore “A Different Approach to Influence: Non-Giving as a Viable Government Relations Strategy.”

As described in Dealbook, IBM is one of only a handful of large U.S. companies that are not involved in direct political giving to candidates, and has advocated for public policy to address risks related to facial recognition software, artificial intelligence and even the workings of government. How do they do it? As companies struggle with increased reputational risk related to political contributions, is non-spending truly a viable strategy? And, beyond spending, how should companies think about advocacy relative to broader societal issues?

In this module, we explore:

• What is the thinking behind IBM’s non-spending strategy? Is it sustainable? 

• How did IBM make that decision, and how do you make it work?

The Corporate Political Responsibility Taskforce (CPRT)’s Expert Dialogues are in-depth, recorded conversations with academic experts, stakeholder advocates and business practitioners to provide our members and other CPR champions with the expertise and context they need to develop principled, proactive CPR strategies. Specifically crafted as conversation-starters for business students, government affairs officers, sustainability executives, diversity, equity and inclusion leaders, investors, academic experts, and stakeholder advocates, each module is designed to spark constructive, non-partisan, principles-based dialogue without “being political.”

Christopher A. Padilla leads IBM's global government affairs team of more than 100 professionals in thirty six countries. His team represents IBM’s interests before governments worldwide on such issues as cyber security policy, taxation, trade, intellectual property rights, workforce and education policy, and government procurement. He is also responsible for corporate compliance with export controls, economic sanctions, and customs regulations. He has been named one of Washington’s Top Corporate Lobbyists by The Hill newspaper.

Keywords: #CPRPracticesPoliticalSpending #CPRPracticesResponsibility #CPAPoliticalSpending #CPRPracticesCandidates #CPALobbying #CorporatePoliticalResponsibility #CPRPracticesEEEngagment

More Resources

Sort by type
321 – 324 of 324 results showing
ReportAccountAbility, UN Global Compact

This guide provides a framework for companies and NGO's to use to determine whether their lobbying practices are responsible.

View Details
BookBerrett Koehler

The book opens by establishing the minimum expectation that businesses support the right rules of the game—those rewarding long-term value creation rather than destruction—and shows how companies can live their values through cross-sector collaboration, eco-efficiency, and strategies advancing prosperity, planet, and people, supported by real-world cases.

View Details
ArticleMIT Sloan

Presents a framework for when companies should present forceful or tempered political positions based on their publicly stated values and materiality.

View Details
Website

The Long-Term Stock Exchange (LTSE) listing standards include expectations that companies will take responsibility for long-term decision-making across strategy, governance, executive compensation, stakeholder engagement, and investor relations. These standards are designed to help businesses build sustainable value over time for all stakeholders, rather than focusing on short-term gains, allowing investors to better assess long-term capital investments.

 

View Details
Share.

Do you have a resource to recommend for The CPR Hub? Please reach out and we will review it for future updates!

Receive Updates from The CPR Hub

Learn about new tools, insights and events to help you consider how CPR can help your company, clients or members.

Stay in the loop.